Ghost orbs vs environmental orb
related: Evaluating ghostly orb anomalies.
The IGHS has
pointed out that all creatures and living things are supposed to
have a 'life force' that sustains life. Furthermore, this 'life
force' in humans is considered to be the soul or spirit that retains
the intelligence, emotions and personality of the human being that
survive death. This 'life force' survives death because energy
cannot be destroyed but may transformed into other energy patterns
that represents the existence of the spirit. moreover, the orb is
the basic energy pattern or shape of the spirit world unlike the
orthodox view which suggests that spirit existence is represented by
the human figure in a transparent manner.
the existence of the spirit is represented by the energy patterns
that are generated by the spirit, therefore there are many kinds of
energy patterns that we have captured on film but do not have the
same shape, because the spirit has no physical body that holds a
tools on spirit energy patterns.
I would like to
share my experience in research investigation on tools that I have
used. I have used a non-digital camera Canon EOS888 that is very
good but involves very high cost. Moreover, I have used a canon
digital camera (3.2 mega pixels) with internal light. At present, I
am using a Canon EOS350D digital camera (8.0 mega pixels) with
external light that can light up up to 105 feet.
In comparison, the
high pixels are really handy when it comes to evaluation of an
anomaly that is printed on film. The photos that were captured with
8 mega pixels can be zoomed up to 800% more without distorting the
image unlike the 3.2 mega pixels that only can be zoomed up to the
maximum of 180% or less. Furthermore, there are digital cameras of
12 mega pixels that are available in the market but they will be
more expensive depending on the brand.
Since the lighting
is important to highlight the presence of the spirit in the dark,
therefore the use of an external light that can light up more than
20 feet can help us to identify the anomaly that has been
highlighted on film. Moreover, it is even easier to evaluate photos
captured in powerful light. In fact, photos captured in dim light or
less powerful light tend to produce photos with high noise that make
it difficult to evaluate the anomaly printed on it.
orbs that are related to the environment.
I would like to
point out the differences and the logical explanation regarding the
orb mistaken to be that generated by the environment. As I mentioned
earlier, the use of good tools such as high resolution digital
camera and good lighting system will make it easier for us to
evaluate an anomaly that is printed on film.
In the examples
below, zoomed Photo Number 1 and 2 are the tiniest insects that
exist in most places such as near the swamp, jungles and bushes in
Malaysia. Nevertheless, the mosquito and the moth are also commonly
found at night. Meanwhile, zoomed Photos Number 2b, 2e and 2f are
related to the dust since it is transparent with a remarkable
demarcated outer ring on it. However, photo Number 2c and 2d are
related to the surrounding weather conditions that produce mist.
Therefore, what I
would like to suggest is that the ghostly orb that is related to the
environment has a particular shape that is related to the anomaly
that generates the ghostly orb. As I mentioned earlier, high
resolution photos and good lighting system help us a lot when it
comes to evaluating an anomaly.
The photo above is the actual
photo of an tiny insect that is common in Malaysia and its size is
smaller than the letter 'M' that is of the 12 font in size. This
tiny insect mentioned is represented by Photo Number 1 and 2 in
In my opinion, how ever tiny the
insect may be, it still has its remarkable shape because of its
physique that holds its shape. Let us see Photos Number 1 and 2,
which are ghostly anomalies that can be mistaken as ghosts. However,
close examination suggests that these are insects. The blurring is
due to the flapping of wings that flap up and down and Photo Number
2 shows the distinct shape of an insect. The Photos below were taken
from Augustine Towonsing who is the founder of Malaysian ghost
Insight on orbs that are related to
spirit energy patterns.
photos below are the photos that somewhat may represent the energy
patterns that are related to the existence of the spirit. Since the
spirit existence is in energy form, therefore its existence does not
hold fixed shape.
like to share my opinion about these anomalies which we can put into
2 groups. The first group is the anomaly that looks flat or has 1
dimension, which are Photos Numbers 3,4,5,7,8 and 10. Meanwhile
Photos Number 6 and 9 look appear to have 2 dimensions.
from its appearance these anomalies fall into one similar pattern
that we call ghost orb or ghost orb in motion. One thing that makes
me believe that these photos have captured the spirit that exist in
the form of an orb is because I could not find the familiar shape
that is related to the insect pattern.
Number 6 and 9 are similar, in that they appear to have 2 dimensions
which I always refer to be an "ecto ball" because of its appearance
that looks round, and I have personally witnessed with the naked eye
this "ecto ball" which looks round, floating on the ground as big as
a football that caused the charged camera battery to become
Meanwhile, Photos Number 8 and 10 are similar in that both are in
stationary state but the ghost orb in Photo Number 8 emits extreme
bright light. However, Photo Number 10 looks more spherical, having
substance and the outer ring is not demarcated.
Photo Number 7 is rare. I believe that this ball of fire may not
related to the human spirit. Closed examination suggests that this
anomaly emits light with a slight red contrail.
Furthermore, this fire ball is believed to be
generated by the spirit/ghost entity because there are no light
sources that can generate such an anomaly.
orb versus orb related to the Malaysian environment.
First of all, this discussion
would evaluate and compare what I believe to be the ghost orb that
is really generated by the spirit energy, with the ghostly orb that
is generated by the environment. Furthermore, my discussion centers
on insects within Malaysia only that includes the most common that I
have mentioned earlier.
Let us analyze one very good
sentence that puts down the validity of these photos. "This photo is
nothing more than the anomaly that is associated with a flying
insect." This sentence will be very good to put down Photos Numbers
3,4 and 5 because their appearance.
Now, let me explain deeper to see
whether this anomaly is related to the flying insect:
I have brought to view the tiniest
insect that I believe exists in most places in Malaysia. The photos
that represent those insect mentioned are Photos Number 1 and 2
which are smaller than a mosquito in size. yet, the shape that
resembles the insect's physical existence is distinct. Mean while, a
bigger sized insect such as moth can be seen clearly, that is
represented by Photo Number 2a.
Now, look at Photos Number 3,4 and
5. My close examination suggests that this photo does not give
meaningful shape that can be associated with an insect. For example
in Photo Number 3, what I can see here is the main orb moves
upwards, seen from the transparent contrail behind it. Meanwhile,
the blurring on top looks as if the orb is moving downwards because
of its transparent contrail. The blurring on top cannot be the
flapping of wings because the flapping of wings will be blur,
whereas one of the mini orbs is solid. Furthermore, the center of
this anomaly is extremely bright. Now we return to Photos Number 1
and 2, where the blurring due to flapping wings is distinct and
We move on to Photo Number 4. If
someone assumes that this anomaly is associated with a flying
insect, what kind of insect could it be. I have pointed out exactly
how tiny an insect may be but the shape of its physical existence
won't be blurred. In my opinion, the first thing that we should
consider is to look at the physical existence of the insect. Should
the anomaly be associated with an insect, then the physical
existence should be revealed by looking at the physical shape that
may make sense distinctly as an insect. In my opinion, this anomaly
is not related to the flying insect since this anomaly is bigger in
size compared to the zoomed photo of the tiny insect. Yet, the shape
does not make sense to be that of an insect.
Finally we move on to Photo Number
5. This photo, if someone assume it to be an insect, then I have no
idea what kind of insect it would be, since the shape does not make
sense to be that of an insect. Furthermore, I could not see any
blurring that is related to the flying insect or blurring due to
flapping wings. What I could see is that, there are mini orbs
surrounding the main orb. Furthermore the bigger orb emits bright
light. Meanwhile the rest of the mini orbs are hovering within the
bigger orb. If it is an insect, then the physical existence such as
legs and wings should also be able to be seen.
Someone might say that the insect
emits bright light due to the camera flash light and that this
insect was captured close to the lens. Now, let us see the 2 photos
which I have downloaded from ghostweb.com. At a glance, we
definitely can recognize the first photo is a butterfly. Mean while,
the other one might be mistaken to be ghost orb in motion. However,
only those who do not understand the energy patterns that are
related to the existence ghosts will claim this photo to be ghostly.
Since ghost existence is related to energy, therefore the energy
pattern that represents the spirit existence is distinct, would make
sense and will not be odd from the energy pattern that should be.
From the discussion, I myself have
no doubt to accept those anomalies because I can see the difference
between anomaly related to the flying insect and those related to
the energy that is generated by the spirit.
If someone tells me the shape of
those anomalies and what kind of insect there are by providing me
solid evidence and details that explain its relationship, then I
should have no doubt to accept the given explanations associated
with flying insects. However, we should understand the basic nature
of a flying insect that mostly flaps its wings while flying.
Therefore, when we insist on the insect nature as flapping of wings
while flying with Photos Number 3,4 and 5, then it would really not
Therefore, we may fail to evaluate
ghostly photos that might be valid to be an energy pattern related
to the spirit existence if we use a less powerful camera lighting
system or use a digital camera that produces low resolution photos.
Furthermore, IGHS teaches that the
existence of the spirit is represented by energy patterns.
Therefore, the anomaly that the ghost generates would have no
physical shape that holds meaningful shape that resembles the shape
that is related to the insect. Moreover, I believe that how ever
tiny an insect may be, it still holds a meaningful shape that is
related to its kind. Furthermore, its shape still can be traced
because of its distinct shape. This explanation also applies to the
insect that is captured close to the lens that reveals the insect's
own distinct shape.